d
Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
Administration News
Most of Medicare and Medicaid Savings in Bush's FY
2008 Budget Proposal Come From Reducing Growth in
Medicare Provider Payments
The "lion's share" of the Medicare and Medicaid savings over
five years proposed in President Bush's fiscal year 2008 budget
proposal comes from limits on annual inflation adjustments for
reimbursements to hospitals, nursing homes and other health care
providers for Medicare, amounting to $39.5 billion, CQ HealthBeat
reports (Reichard [1], CQ HealthBeat, 2/5). The total five year savings for
the two programs under Bush's budget is about $101.5 billion (Kaiser
Daily Health Policy Report, 2/5). The budget proposal would reduce Medicare reimbursements to
providers by 0.65% in FY 2008. In addition, the budget proposal would
end a practice under which Medicare reimburses providers when
beneficiaries fail to pay their bills. The budget proposal also would
automatically reduce reimbursements by 0.4% when Medicare general
revenue exceeds 45% of the total cost of the program and would reduce
reimbursements to providers that fail to submit price and quality
data after 2008. Under the budget proposal, Medicare reimbursements
to hospitals would decrease by about $30 billion over five years,
according to industry analysts (Zhang, Wall Street Journal, 2/6). In
addition to the $76 billion in Medicare savings over five years from
legislative changes, the budget proposal includes $10.2 billion in
savings from administrative changes to improve "efficiency,
productivity and program integrity," HHS said
(Reichard [1], CQ HealthBeat, 2/5). The budget proposal would
"eliminate annual indexing on income thresholds" to require a larger
number of higher-income Medicare beneficiaries to pay increased
premiums in future years. Currently, individual Medicare
beneficiaries with annual incomes that exceed $80,000 and married
couples with annual incomes that exceed $160,000 pay increased
premiums. In addition, the proposal would implement a premium based
on income in the Medicare prescription drug benefit (Kaiser Daily
Health Policy Report, 2/5). The annual growth rate of Medicare would decrease to 5.6% from 6.5%
within five years under the budget proposal, HHS Secretary Mike
Leavitt said (Zhang, Wall Street Journal, 2/6).
Medicaid, SCHIP
The budget proposal includes about $26 billion in Medicaid savings --
$13 billion from legislative changes and $12.7 billion from
administrative changes -- over five years. According to CQ
HealthBeat, the budget proposal would reduce Medicaid reimbursements
for administrative costs and pharmacies and make "it hard for owners
of more valuable homes to qualify" for the program, CQ HealthBeat
reports (Reichard [1], CQ HealthBeat, 2/5). The budget proposal would
limit Medicaid matching rates for administrative costs to 50% (Zhang,
Wall Street Journal, 2/6). In addition, the budget proposal would
reduce Medicaid reimbursements to government providers for savings of
$5 billion, eliminate certain reimbursements for school-based
services for savings of $3.6 billion, revise coverage of
rehabilitation services for savings of $2.2 billion and eliminate
reimbursements for graduate medical education for savings of $1.8
billion (Reichard [1], CQ HealthBeat, 2/5). Under the budget
proposal, the annual growth rate of Medicaid would decrease from 7.3%
to 7.1% over five years (Zhang, Wall Street Journal, 2/6). The budget
proposal includes a $5 billion increase in funds for SCHIP over five
years -- "far short of the $12 billion or more that experts say is
needed to keep covering the 6 million children now in the program,"
the Washington Post reports (Lee, Washington Post, 2/6). The budget proposal would limit SCHIP
eligibility to children in families with annual incomes less than
200% of the federal poverty level, or about $38,000 for a family of
four (Gay Stolberg, New York Times, 2/6).
At least 17 states have expanded SCHIP eligibility to children in
families with annual incomes less than 350% of the poverty level
(Solomon, Wall Street Journal, 2/6).
Other Health Proposals
The budget proposal would increase funds for FDA (www.fda.gov)
by $100 million, which would include "the first user fee for the
generic drug industry as well as a big boost in fees paid by brand-
name pharmaceutical companies," the Newark Star-Ledger reports.
The $2.1 billion FDA budget includes almost $444 million in user
fees from industries regulated by the agency, with $15.7 million in
fees from generic pharmaceutical companies. In addition, the FDA
budget for prescription drug safety oversight would increase by $11.2
million, and the agency budget for medical device safety oversight
would increase by $7.2 million (Cohen, Newark Star-Ledger, 2/6). The
FDA budget also includes $10.6 million to fund food safety oversight,
"including the development of better methods to detect and find the
source of foodborne illness outbreaks," Dow Jones reports (Corbett
Dooren, Dow Jones, 2/5). The budget proposal would reduce funds for
CDC core programs -- such as disease control,
health information services and bioterrorism response -- by $500
million to about $6 billion, according to the Campaign for Public Health
(Nesmith, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 2/6).
The budget proposal includes $1.2 billion to fund preparations for
a flu pandemic, with $870 million to help fund the development of
vaccines, antiviral medications and rapid diagnostic tests. In
addition, the budget proposal includes $4.3 billion in funds for HHS
for bioterrorism preparedness, with $1.1 billion for state and local
governments and hospitals to upgrade their public health emergency
response capabilities. The budget proposal would provide $5.7 billion
for the Health Resources and Services Administration;
$3 billion for the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration;
and 28.7 billion for NIH (Reichard [2], CQ
HealthBeat, 2/5). The budget proposal would provide about $2.2
billion for state and local grants and training programs for
emergency first responders (Strohm, CongressDaily, 2/6).
The budget is available online.
Bush Administration Comments
Bush said that the priorities in his budget proposal are "protecting
the homeland and fighting terrorism, keeping the economy strong with
low taxes and keeping spending under control." In addition, he said,
"Congress needs to listen to a budget which says no tax increase, and
a budget, because of fiscal discipline, that can be balanced in five
years" (Taylor, AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/6). Leavitt said,
"Restraining Medicare spending is a key factor in ensuring that the
program will be sustainable for future generations" (Lipman, Cox/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 2/6).
Reaction Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said, "His budget hands
out favors for the oil and gas industry, while eroding health
coverage for children and seniors" (Solomon, Wall Street Journal,
2/6). House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that the budget
proposal is "more of the same fiscal irresponsibility and misplaced
priorities; it takes our country in the wrong direction" (Mercer,
Media General/Richmond Times-Dispatch, 2/6). Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said, "Congress
must do more to fund" SCHIP than the budget proposal (Washington
Post, 2/6). Baucus added that the committee will "take a thoughtful
look at ways to save money in Medicare and Medicaid without harming
the health of America's elderly and disadvantaged" (Zhang, Wall
Street Journal, 2/6). House Budget Committee
(http://budget.house.gov) ranking member Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said, "I
fully support the president's goal of balancing the budget -- without
raising taxes -- by supporting continued economic growth and job
creation and by further restraining federal spending" (Dennis/Higa,
CQ Today, 2/5). (www.fahs.com) Federation of American Hospitals
President Chip Kahn said that the budget proposal "is the wrong
budget at the wrong time and would harm those seniors who depend upon
America's hospitals" (Zhang, Wall Street Journal, 2/6). American
Hospital Association President Rich
Umbdenstock said, "Today's budget is devastating news for children,
seniors and the disabled who depend on the Medicare and Medicaid
programs. They are being unfairly singled out to carry the burden of
achieving a balanced budget" (AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/6). AARP
CEO Bill Novelli said that the budget proposal calls
for "piecemeal cuts that threaten to damage critical programs without
addressing the fundamental problems that exist in our entire health
care system." American Medical Association (www.ama-assn.org)
officials in a statement said that they are "deeply disappointed"
that Bush did not propose to eliminate scheduled reductions to
Medicare physician reimbursements (Lipman, Cox/Atlanta Journal-
Constitution, 2/6). Medicare Rights Center
President Bob Hayes said, "The president is looking to save money in
all the wrong places." Joe Antos of the American Enterprise Institute said, "To the extent we can generate a little
bit more in premiums, it's going to help a little bit. The bigger fix
is to find a way to improve the efficiency of the program" (USA Today, 2/6).
Broadcast Coverage
Several broadcast programs reported on the budget proposal:
- PBS' "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer" ():
The segment includes interviews with Rob Portman, director of the
White House Office of Management and Budget,
and Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (D-N.D.).
In addition, the segment includes comments from Bush and House
Budget Committee Chair John Spratt (D-S.C.) (Woodruff, "NewsHour
with Jim Lehrer," PBS, 2/6). Audio and a transcript of the segment
are available online.
- PBS' "Nightly Business Report" ():
The segment includes comments from Portman, Kahn and Rep. Pete
Stark (D-Calif.) (Gharib, "Nightly Business Report," PBS, 2/5).
A transcript of the segment is available online.
- NPR's "All Things Considered":
The segment includes comments from Portman and Bush (Greene, "All
Things Considered," NPR, 2/5). Audio of the segment is available online.
"All Things Considered" also included analyses of the budget
proposal. The segment includes comments from Julie Rovner, a health
policy correspondent for NPR (Norris, "All Things Considered," NPR,
2/5). Audio of the segment is available online. In addition, "All
Things Considered" included an interview with Stan Collender, a
budget analyst at Qorvis Communications
(Siegel, "All Things Considered," NPR, 2/5). Audio of the segment is available online.
- NPR's "Morning Edition":
The segment includes comments from Conrad and Sen. Judd Gregg
(R-N.H.) (Naylor, "Morning Edition," NPR, 2/6). Audio of the
segment is available online.
|