Steve Gold, The Disability Odyssey continues
The Disability Law Center in Boston (Massachusetts'"P&A"), nine
Independent Living Centers throughout Massachusetts, and the Statewide ILC
recently filed their recommendations to the MA Department of Housing and
Community Development (DHCD) regarding the MA 2008 allocation of
Low-Income Housing Tax Credits to increase the number of units for persons
on SSI.
These recommendations were submitted as part of the federally-mandated
Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) process, with which States must comply
each year. Because LIHTC is the largest growing federal housing program
in the country and because these advocates warrant KUDOS, we want other
advocates to know what the MA advocacy community is requesting.
Throughout the country, the extremely competitive demand for LIHTC exceeds
the supply by nearly 3 to 1, which means that Housing Finance Agencies
throughout the country could do exactly what the MA advocates are
requesting. Here's a summary of their recommendations. For a full copy,
go to http://www.dlc-ma.org/QAP_Comments.doc
First, according to the most recent data available, nationally only 7% of
LIHTC were targeted to households with incomes at or below 30% of the Area
Median Income. Even though the MA's LIHTC program had exceeded the
national average by requiring, as a threshold, that 10% of all LIHTC units
had to be already targeted to households whose incomes are at or below 30%
of the Area Median Income, the MA advocates recommended that the 2008 QAP
have an additional threshold requirement for another10% of the units to be
targeted to persons with "very low incomes"(i.e., on SSI) with
disabilities through project based vouchers - well below 30% of the AMI.
Second, the MA recommended that developers who are awarded LIHTC as a
result of the competitive process be required to submit a plan to ensure
that the additional 10% of the units will be made available to "very low
income" persons with disabilities.
Third, to ensure people with disabilities are integrated, the advocates
recommended that MA alter its policy so that LIHTC projects will assure
integration by not having more than 15% of the total units in a project
occupied by people with disabilities (absent a compelling programmatic
reason for intensive specialized services that cannot be provided in an
integrated setting).
Fourth, the MA advocates recommended that "visitability" should be a
threshold requirement for ALL new construction and renovation of existing
housing units. This is in addition to DHCD's current extra points for
developers that provide Universal Design.
In a number of other Information Bulletins in the last few years, we have
described the LIHTC process and what advocates should be doing.
MA is one great example. What's happening in your State with LIHTCs?
Are there similar coalitions as exist in MA? Has your P&A and ILCs taken
similar initiatives to increase the supply of Accessible, Affordable,
Integrated housing via LIHTCs?
|