|

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 27, 2006
For Medicare and Medicaid
Background
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization
Act of 2003 (MMA, Pub. L. 108-173) was enacted on December 8,
2003. Section 231 of the MMA introduced a new type of
coordinated care health plan, the Special Needs Plan (SNP), in
the Medicare Advantage (MA) program. SNPs are distinct from
regular MA plans in that they can restrict enrollment to a
group of "special needs" individuals. Special needs individuals
were identified by Congress as:
- institutionalized beneficiaries,
- beneficiaries who are dually eligible for Medicare and
Medicaid (i.e. "dual-eligibles"), and/or
- beneficiaries with severe or disabling chronic conditions.
SNPs provide an opportunity to better integrate care and
provide additional benefits to dual-eligible beneficiaries. For
example, SNPs have the potential to offer the full array of
Medicare and Medicaid benefits, and supplemental benefits,
through a single plan so that beneficiaries have a single
benefit package and one set of providers to obtain the care
they need. This is very important because dual-eligible
beneficiaries are more likely to have preventable complications
resulting from problems with care coordination and integration.
Since their creation in 2004, SNPs have grown rapidly. In 2006,
276 SNPs are available, with over 500,000 beneficiaries
enrolled, and over 440,000dual-eligible beneficiaries enrolled.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) expects such
plans to be even more widely available and more widely used
next year. We also expect that through improved care
integration and coordination, and enhanced accountability for
quality of care, the plans will continue to improve the quality
of care delivered to those they serve.
While SNPs are providing important benefits through needed
coordination and integration of care, States and other
stakeholders have identified important barriers to their
availability for dual-eligible beneficiaries. Over the past
several months, CMS has met with these stakeholders and a
number of outside groups, including the National Health Policy
Group (NHPG), the Center for Health Care Strategies (CHCS), and
the Milbank Memorial Fund, to discuss barriers to successfully
integrating care for the dual-eligibles through SNPs. Based on
the lessons learned from those meetings, and successful steps
implemented by some States and plans to promote more
coordinated care, CMS is implementing an action plan to
facilitate better care for dual-eligibles through SNPs.
The elements include:
* "How To" Guides to assist the States to work with SNPs and
Medicare to streamline administrative processes and provide
fully coordinated Medicare and Medicaid benefits;
* Opportunities for States to support targeted enrollment in
SNPs, to serve different kinds of Medicare-Medicaid
beneficiaries more effectively;
* Greater clarity about the Medicare bidding process for SNPs,
with the opportunity for a coordinated bidding and
contracting process to enable States to benefit from savings
due to better integrated Medicare-Medicaid coverage;
* A model three-way agreement to formalize the relationship
among SNPs, the States and CMS and enable further
streamlining of administrative processes;
* Improved quality measures particularly related to SNP
populations; and
* Additional education and outreach to make States and plans
aware of the opportunity to improve care through SNPs, and
beneficiaries aware of the opportunity to receive better care
through SNPs.
"How To" Guides
Different and sometimes conflicting Medicare and Medicaid rules
have created administrative difficulties for SNPs and confusion
for beneficiaries. To address this issue, CMS has created "How
To" guides in the areas of Marketing, Enrollment and Quality.
These guides provide clarification on Medicare and Medicaid
rules and suggest streamlined processes that States and plans
can use to fulfill Medicare and Medicaid requirements.
For example, the Enrollment "How To" Guide clarifies the
Medicare and Medicaid requirements for a single enrollment form
and provides a model integrated enrollment form. The Marketing
"How To" Guide clarifies CMS' rules on the use of integrated
marketing materials and provides two examples of streamlined
processes to gain Medicare and Medicaid approval of SNP
marketing materials. The Marketing Guide also clarifies that
while a Medicare beneficiary cannot be required to be a member
of a Medicare managed care plan, CMS will consider proposals
from States or Medicare Advantage Plans to permit seamless
transition of individuals who are in a Medicaid managed care
plan into a Medicare SNP offered by the same managed care
organization when they first become eligible for Medicare.
The "How To" guides will be posted on the Agency's website,
but will be considered "living documents" that can be updated
and expanded as needed. In particular, the Agency has committed
to creating model marketing materials that will be added to the
marketing guide. The Agency has put a mailbox on its website
so that interested parties can submit questions and comments.
In order to ensure that CMS policies that can facilitate
integration are applied in a consistent manner across regions,
CMS will arrange for training to be provided to the CMS
regional office plan managers who work with the States and
with SNPs. Training sessions are scheduled to begin during the
last week in July.
Targeted SNP Enrollment
Some States currently exclude some dual-eligible groups from
Medicaid managed care for a variety of practical reasons. For
example, States establish programs that are different for the
aged and disabled, and those with different levels of Medicaid
benefits, to better target services to each group. CMS has not
allowed similar targeted enrollment or "subsetting" by States
in SNPs, with limited exceptions. This policy has been an
impediment to States working with SNPs, and an impediment to
care integration.
To address this issue, CMS is implementing a new policy to
allow SNPs to target enrollment to certain population subsets
under the condition that the SNPs have a relationship with the
State Medicaid Agency. Specifically, this policy will allow
SNPs that coordinate their efforts with State Medicaid Agencies
to target services to just aged duals, disabled duals, or other
specialized dual groups to facilitate their care with
specialized provider networks. Details of the policy will be
announced shortly.
Opportunities to Improve Coordination and Enhance State Savings
through Medicare and Medicaid Contractual Arrangements with SNPs
The SNP Medicare contracting process provides an opportunity
for States to benefit from better coordinated and more
effective services for dual-eligible beneficiaries, making
State Medicaid programs more sustainable and effective. On
an annual basis, SNPs submit bids to CMS to provide
beneficiaries with Medicare-covered services, and sometimes
supplemental services. Plans that bid below a benchmark amount
receive a rebate equal to 75% of the savings relative to the
benchmark. Plans are required to use the rebate money to
provide extra benefits to enrollees. Possible extra benefits
include the reduction of cost sharing for Medicare-covered
services, added benefits such as vision and dental care not
covered by Medicare, or a direct reduction in the MA plan
premium for A and B services (representing Medicare cost
sharing), or the Part D premium, or the Part B premium.
For duals, these extra benefits could either directly replace
financial obligations of the State (e.g. when the SNP rather
than the State pays Medicare cost sharing on behalf of a dual-
eligible), or provide services that would be otherwise have to
be covered by Medicaid. Consequently, SNP plans have the
potential to save States money, particularly if the State is
making capitated payments to a Medicare Advantage plan that is
providing both Medicare and Medicaid services.
Because SNPs may consider their bidding information to be
proprietary, CMS does not release such information unless
required by law. However, plans may share this information with
the States, and States can get publicly available information
on the covered services and additional benefits offered by a
plan before entering into a contract for Medicaid services.
Further, States may require that bidding information be shared
with the State as a condition of contracting for Medicaid
services. To help States gain a better understanding of
the bidding process, the Center for Health Care Strategies
(CHCS) is developing a guide which includes information on the
Medicare bidding process and is scheduled to be released in
September. CMS is consulting with CHCS on this project.
Two key topics related to the bidding process are rate setting
and risk adjustment. CHCS issued a guide in June 2006 on rate
setting and risk adjustment for integrated care programs. The
Guide provides a checklist on rate setting and design
considerations in integrating Medicaid and Medicare services.
Three-Way Agreements Involving States, CMS, and SNPs to
Facilitate Care Integration Some SNPs have formalized the
relationship among the SNP, the State and CMS by entering into
joint agreements such as three-way contracts or memorandums of
understanding. States that have entered into such agreements
believe that they are a critical tool for formalizing the
relationship among the parties, clarifying roles and
responsibilities, and facilitating care integration. CMS
has begun work with the Center for Health Care Strategies to
develop a model three-way agreement. Successful agreements have
been developed in demonstration programs in Minnesota and
Massachusetts and may serve as useful templates.
Improved Quality Measures for SNPs
CMS currently requires all Medicare coordinated care plans
(which include SNPs), to report Health Plan Employer Data and
Information Set (HEDIS̉) performance measures. However, the
current set of measures does not provide performance
information on the unique issues related to the quality of care
provided by plans to SNP enrollees. CMS is collaborating with
the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) to identify
new performance measures specifically for SNPs. While they will
build upon the traditional measurement tools, we expect
that the tailored measures for SNP enrollees will reflect their
special or chronic conditions. Thus, those individuals with
AIDS should have some different measures than those with
chronic heart failure. We expect that all the measures will be
collected and reported at the individual SNP plan level,
which will enable comparison across plans.
Education and Outreach on Special Needs Plans
This Fall, CMS will implement an outreach campaign to make
States and plans more aware of the opportunity to integrate
care through SNPs. We will work closely with the National
Association of State Medicaid Directors (NASMD), The National
Governors Association (NGA), and the National Council of State
Legislatures (NCSL) to provide States with the opportunity to
learn more through discussion forums and sharing of best
practices from States with existing SNPs. Further, CMS will
encourage organizations with SNPs to work with States to
further integrate and improve care for dual-eligible
beneficiaries. In addition, we will provide our partners with
ongoing guidance and supporting material for reaching their
audiences.
CMS will also conduct outreach to beneficiaries to educate them
about the opportunity to receive integrated care through SNPs.
We will work collaboratively with our national and community-
based partners, including various networks representing non-
English speaking constituencies within Asian-American,
Hispanic, and African-American communities as well as
faith-based community organizations. This effort will be
national in scope but executed primarily locally. Clear and
consistent messages will be delivered through various channels
directly to beneficiaries. We will monitor our success in
achieving our campaign objectives by maintaining regular
communications with external stakeholder groups and grassroots
partners.
|